Stable Marriage Problem Solver
Solve the stable marriage / stable matching problem using the Gale-Shapley algorithm. Paste ranked preference lists for two equally-sized groups and get the guaranteed-stable pairing, with an animated proposal-by-proposal trace, satisfaction statistics, blocking-pair verification, and an interactive bipartite visualization.
Your ad blocker is preventing us from showing ads
MiniWebtool is free because of ads. If this tool helped you, please support us by going Premium (ad‑free + faster tools), or allowlist MiniWebtool.com and reload.
- Allow ads for MiniWebtool.com, then reload
- Or upgrade to Premium (ad‑free)
About Stable Marriage Problem Solver
The Stable Marriage Problem Solver is an interactive implementation of the Gale-Shapley deferred-acceptance algorithm, the 1962 matching algorithm that David Gale and Lloyd Shapley proved always produces a stable pairing between two equally-sized groups given each member's full ranking of the other side. This tool takes your preference lists, runs the algorithm step by step, and shows the result as a stable matching, an animated bipartite visualization, preference heatmaps, and a verified proof that no blocking pair exists.
What Is the Stable Marriage Problem?
Given two disjoint sets of equal size — say n men and n women, or n applicants and n positions — and a complete preference list from every member ranking every member of the other side, a matching is a one-to-one pairing between the two sets. The matching is called stable if no pair (a, b) outside the matching would both rather be together than stay with their assigned partners.
Formally, a matching M is stable if there is no blocking pair — a pair (a, b) with a matched to b' and b matched to a' such that:
If both conditions hold, both a and b would abandon their current partners, which destabilises the matching. A stable matching is one where no such pair exists.
The Gale-Shapley Algorithm
Gale and Shapley proved — constructively — that a stable matching always exists for any set of preferences, and they gave an efficient algorithm to find one. The algorithm runs in rounds:
- Every unengaged proposer proposes to the highest-ranked receiver on their list who has not yet rejected them.
- Each receiver who got one or more proposals picks the one they prefer most (compared against any current tentative fiancé) and tentatively accepts; everyone else is rejected.
- Rejected proposers become free again and move on to their next choice in the following round.
- The algorithm terminates when every proposer is engaged — which is guaranteed to happen in at most n² proposals.
Key Theoretical Properties
Existence & Uniqueness
A stable matching always exists (Gale & Shapley, 1962), but is not necessarily unique. For a given preference set there can be multiple stable matchings, and they form a lattice ordered by joint preference.
Proposer Optimality
When one side proposes, Gale-Shapley produces the proposer-optimal stable matching: every proposer receives the best partner they could possibly be paired with in any stable matching. By a symmetric argument, this is also the receiver-pessimal matching — the receiving side gets their worst stable partner. Switching the proposing side in this calculator often changes the result.
Strategy Proofness for Proposers
Under Gale-Shapley, proposers have no incentive to misreport their preferences: telling the truth is a dominant strategy for them. Receivers, however, can sometimes benefit from strategic misreporting — one of the reasons the hospital-residents market in the US is designed with students as the proposing side.
Rural Hospitals Theorem
The set of unmatched agents is identical across all stable matchings. So if your instance has unbalanced sizes (beyond the scope of this classic tool) the same people will be unmatched in every stable solution.
Input Format
This calculator expects one line per member, with name followed by a colon and a full ranked preference list separated by commas:
Requirements:
- Both groups must have exactly the same number of members.
- Every member must rank every member of the other group — no partial lists.
- Names can use letters, digits, underscores, hyphens, spaces, and common Unicode letters.
- Up to 15 members per side are supported for fast interactive animation.
How to Use This Calculator
- Enter preferences for Group A in the left text area — one line per member, full ranked list.
- Enter preferences for Group B in the right text area — one line per member, same format.
- Pick the proposing side. Choose Group A or Group B. Try both to compare the A-optimal vs B-optimal outcomes.
- Click "Solve Stable Matching." The calculator runs Gale-Shapley and produces the stable pairs, statistics, animation, and proof of stability.
- Scrub the animation with the play / step / reset controls to see every proposal, acceptance, swap, and rejection in order.
- Inspect the heatmap. Each cell shows the ranking; the yellow-outlined cells form the final matching — look at how high or low those cells sit to see how "happy" each side is.
Worked Example — The Classic 3×3
Men: Alex, Bryan, Chris. Women: Bea, Claire, Diana. Preferences:
Running Gale-Shapley with men proposing yields Alex–Bea, Bryan–Claire, Chris–Diana in a single round (every man's first choice matches a woman whose first choice is someone else — no conflict). The matching is stable: no man-woman pair would both be better off swapping partners, so there is no blocking pair.
Real-World Applications
| Application | Group A | Group B | Who proposes |
|---|---|---|---|
| NRMP Residency Match (US) | Medical students | Hospital programs | Students — designed to be student-optimal since 1998 |
| NYC / Boston School Choice | Families | Public schools | Families — replaced a strategic-gaming mechanism in the 2000s |
| College Admissions | Applicants | Universities | Originally Gale-Shapley's motivating example |
| Kidney Exchange | Donor-recipient pairs | Other donor-recipient pairs | Specialized cycle-finding extension of matching theory |
| Dating & Roommate Matching | Users | Potential partners | Consumer apps often use simplified versions of the same idea |
Why Lloyd Shapley Won a Nobel Prize
In 2012 the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics to Lloyd Shapley (for the theory, alongside David Gale who had passed away) and Alvin Roth (for applying the theory to real markets, including redesigning the US medical residency match and kidney exchange networks). The award cited "the theory of stable allocations and the practice of market design."
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the stable marriage problem?
The stable marriage problem asks: given two equally-sized groups where each member ranks all members of the other group from most to least preferred, can we pair everyone up so that no two people would both prefer to leave their current partners for each other? Such a pairing is called a stable matching. The Gale-Shapley algorithm solves this problem in O(n²) time and always finds a stable matching.
How does the Gale-Shapley algorithm work?
The Gale-Shapley deferred-acceptance algorithm proceeds in rounds. In each round, every currently-unengaged proposer proposes to the highest-ranked receiver on their list who has not yet rejected them. Each receiver tentatively accepts the best proposal received so far and rejects the rest; any displaced proposer becomes free again. The algorithm terminates when no proposer is free, which happens in at most n² proposals.
Is the stable matching unique?
No. A stable matching instance can have many stable matchings. However, when one side proposes, Gale-Shapley always produces the proposer-optimal stable matching: every proposer gets the best partner they could possibly get in any stable matching. By symmetry, this is also the receiver-pessimal matching for the other side. Switching the proposing side often yields a different stable matching.
What is a blocking pair?
A blocking pair is a pair (a, b) that is not currently matched where a prefers b to their current partner AND b also prefers a to their current partner. If any blocking pair exists, the matching is unstable because those two would rather pair up with each other. A stable matching has no blocking pairs, which this calculator verifies automatically after each solve.
What are real applications of stable matching?
The Gale-Shapley algorithm powers the National Resident Matching Program that assigns medical students to residencies in the United States, school-choice systems in Boston and New York, college admissions in several countries, organ-donor kidney exchange chains, and roommate-assignment systems. Lloyd Shapley and Alvin Roth won the 2012 Nobel Prize in Economics partly for this work.
Do both groups need to be the same size?
In the classical stable marriage formulation, yes. Both sides must have the same number of members and each must provide a complete ranking of the other side. Unbalanced variants (such as the stable matching with incomplete lists or the hospital-residents problem) exist but require modified algorithms. This calculator enforces equal sizes and complete preference lists.
Further Reading
- Stable marriage problem — Wikipedia
- Gale-Shapley algorithm — Wikipedia
- National Resident Matching Program — Wikipedia
- 2012 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences — Shapley & Roth
Reference this content, page, or tool as:
"Stable Marriage Problem Solver" at https://MiniWebtool.com// from MiniWebtool, https://MiniWebtool.com/
by miniwebtool team. Updated: Apr 22, 2026
You can also try our AI Math Solver GPT to solve your math problems through natural language question and answer.