Confidence Interval for Proportion Calculator

Welcome to the Confidence Interval for Proportion Calculator, a comprehensive statistical tool for calculating confidence intervals when you have categorical data with two outcomes (success/failure, yes/no, etc.). This calculator offers both the traditional Wald method (normal approximation) and the more accurate Wilson score method, with detailed step-by-step solutions and visual representations.

What is a Confidence Interval for a Proportion?

A confidence interval (CI) for a proportion provides a range of plausible values for the true population proportion based on sample data. When you observe x successes in n trials, the sample proportion p̂ = x/n is your point estimate. However, due to sampling variability, the true population proportion p likely differs from p̂. A confidence interval quantifies this uncertainty.

For example, if you survey 500 voters and 275 prefer Candidate A (p̂ = 0.55 or 55%), a 95% confidence interval might be (0.506, 0.594). This means you can be 95% confident that the true proportion of all voters who prefer Candidate A is between 50.6% and 59.4%.

Calculation Methods

Wald Method (Normal Approximation)

The Wald method is the traditional approach taught in most statistics courses. It uses the normal approximation to the binomial distribution:

Where:

• p̂ = Sample proportion (x/n)
• z* = Critical value from standard normal distribution
• n = Sample size

Advantages: Simple to calculate and understand. Limitations: Can produce poor results for small samples or when p is close to 0 or 1; may produce bounds outside [0,1].

Wilson Score Method

The Wilson score interval provides better coverage probability, especially for small samples or extreme proportions:

Advantages: Better coverage probability for all sample sizes; never produces bounds outside [0,1]; recommended for small samples and extreme proportions. Limitations: Slightly more complex formula.

When to Use Each Method

Understanding Confidence Levels

The confidence level (commonly 90%, 95%, or 99%) represents how often the method produces intervals containing the true parameter across repeated sampling:

How to Use This Calculator

1. Enter successes (x): The count of outcomes with the characteristic you are measuring
2. Enter sample size (n): The total number of observations
3. Select confidence level: Choose based on your required certainty (95% is most common)
4. Select method: Choose Wald, Wilson, or Both to compare
5. Review results: Examine the interval, visualization, interpretation, and step-by-step solution

Practical Applications

Survey Research

When conducting polls or surveys, confidence intervals help communicate the precision of results. A poll showing 52% support with a ±3% margin of error means the 95% CI is approximately (49%, 55%).

Medical Studies

Clinical trials use CIs to report treatment success rates. If a new drug shows 85% efficacy with 95% CI (78%, 92%), this provides evidence the true efficacy is likely in this range.

Quality Control

Manufacturing processes use CIs to monitor defect rates. If 5 out of 200 items are defective (2.5%), the Wilson 95% CI is (0.8%, 5.7%), indicating the true defect rate.

A/B Testing

Digital marketing uses CIs to compare conversion rates. Non-overlapping confidence intervals provide evidence of a real difference between variations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a confidence interval for a proportion?

A confidence interval for a proportion provides a range of plausible values for the true population proportion based on sample data. For example, if you survey 100 people and 60 prefer Product A, the 95% confidence interval might be (0.50, 0.70), meaning we are 95% confident the true population preference is between 50% and 70%.

What is the difference between Wald and Wilson methods?

The Wald method uses the normal approximation formula p̂ ± z*√(p̂(1-p̂)/n), which is simple but can give poor results for small samples or extreme proportions. The Wilson score method adjusts for these issues and provides better coverage probability. Wilson is generally recommended for most practical applications.

When should I use Wilson instead of Wald?

Use Wilson score interval when: sample size is small (n < 30), the proportion is close to 0 or 1, you need accurate coverage probability, or for any critical decision-making. Wald is acceptable for large samples with moderate proportions, but Wilson is never worse and often better.

What confidence level should I use?

95% is the most common choice and suitable for most applications. Use 99% for critical decisions where you need more certainty, or 90% when you can accept more uncertainty in exchange for a narrower interval.

How do I interpret the margin of error?

The margin of error (MOE) represents the maximum expected difference between your sample proportion and the true population proportion at your chosen confidence level. If your sample shows 60% with a MOE of ±5%, the true value is likely between 55% and 65%.

What sample size do I need for a narrow confidence interval?

Sample size dramatically affects interval width. For a 95% CI with ±5% margin of error, you need approximately 385 samples. For ±3% MOE, about 1,068 samples. For ±1% MOE, nearly 9,604 samples.

Additional Resources

• Binomial Proportion Confidence Interval - Wikipedia
• Confidence Interval - Wikipedia